abujug blogspot

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 4 February 2010

Reader Rebuttal - Fusion

Posted on 09:54 by hony

A reader writes to me, questioning my love of fusion power:
Name one functioning fusion power plant (other than the sun), or even a prototype. Last I heard, we're still decades away from the first one.


Let's ignore that Bussard Fusion is nearly at positive yield, the Navy is on their 8th prototype of Polywell Fusion, and that a commercial plant is conceivable within 10 years.

Instead I want to focus on the core of this argument: "technology proposed does not exist, and possibly never will. Therefore, why fund research that will develop this technology?" Obviously I am not talking about warp drives or teleporters when I say this is a crummy, cynical sort of an argument. Should Benz have ignored the idea that a motor could be strapped to an axle via transmission and power people about town in an "automobile?" Because there was a day when any transport other than a horse or train seemed wildly far-fetched. And there was a day when atoms were the smallest things in the known universe. Should we have pulled funding on atomic structures, just because no one had yet proven that electrons and protons existed?

Teleportation, or faster-than-light travel, are topics I can understand cynicism because they require clear and concise violations of the laws of known physics. But right now I am writing this post near a window and that window has photons coming through it, sent here from a giant fusion reactor 8 light-minutes away, and somehow that fusion reactor is stable and continues to power the solar system. So its not like "fusion" is an impossible dream of science fiction. It's right outside, every day.
And it's not even that humans have never achieved fusion of their own. Although early nuclear weapons only achieved fission, many modern thermonuclear devices depend on fusion reactions inside their warhead for their intense destructive power.
And how often in history has a fundamental physical property/technology been first harnessed for war, and then tweaked for peace? Just think of jet engines...first developed at the end of World War II, and now innocuously used on thousands of passenger planes every day to ferry people about. But was there a time when jet engines, and planes in general, seemed impossibly far-fetched and a waste of government research dollars? Certainly. Aren't we glad that the naysayers weren't the ones with the final say?


_
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Self Defense at its finest.
    Why I own a handgun. Props to the student who used "cognizant" in a sentence. _
  • Copenhagen Hypocrisy Watch, NASA edition
    I don't really want to jump on the "look, they are getting nothing accomplished" bandwagon because they are getting something ...
  • Swine Flu isn't even as deadly as the normal flu
    The CDC reports that in a normal year, approximately 36,000 Americans die from complications due to the flu. 200,000 Americans are hospital...
  • Pandering to my readers.
    As requested. _
  • "Leaving the Right"
    I wish I had time to write about Sullivan's manifesto he published yesterday. It was really pathetic. I just wish I could find someone ...
  • Hypocrisy Watch!
    Nothing says "conserve natural resources" like riding a toxic-gas-spewing rocket into space! The carbon footprint of a single lau...
  • Reinventing College
    TAE holds that the increasing cost of tuition is not increasing the quality of college education. Graduates are not smarter than they were,...
  • Here, I am. Send me.
    So I said: “Woe is me, for I am undone! Because I am a man of unclean lips, And I dwell in the midst of a people of unclea...
  • Haiti
    A youth minister in Haiti helping doctors writes to a friend of mine: I accompanied a small team of doctors to a hospital in Les Cayes that ...
  • TMQ has been reading TAE
    Gregg Easterbrook writes from ESPN : Soon, Barack Obama must make a decision on whether to continue funding NASA's daffy plan to build a...

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2010 (147)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ▼  February (31)
      • Global Exctinction Continues to be a Backpage Item
      • EPIC SHOCKER!!! (hint: not a shocker)
      • NASA's Search For Vision
      • TAE's Utopian Daydreams, Part 2: Integrated Electr...
      • TAE's Utopian Daydreams, Part 1: Cars That Drive T...
      • Ten Years Progress
      • Scary Animal of the Day
      • EPIC SHOCKER!!!
      • Creativity and Youth
      • Energy Innovation
      • Obama Stimulus Working?
      • A Christian Engineer
      • Robonaut 2
      • Cell Phone Bans Don't Work
      • Smart Women
      • Standing Up For Fiscal Conservatism
      • In Which Henry Spencer Asserts Robots Are Inept
      • Obligatory Vancouver Posting
      • Palin
      • Creepy DARPA research watch
      • Blech
      • Apple vs. Google
      • The Years Go Along
      • Countdown to the New Iron Man Movie
      • Evidence of the Decline of Civilization
      • Reader Rebuttal - Fusion
      • Oscar Season
      • Military Can See Through Walls
      • TAE feels bad for doubting President Obama.
      • Happy Palindrome Day!
      • It's a great time to be a wealthy, myopic, suburba...
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2009 (353)
    • ►  December (36)
    • ►  November (46)
    • ►  October (45)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (44)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (50)
    • ►  April (28)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

hony
View my complete profile