abujug blogspot

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 25 August 2009

Cars and Cell Phones

Posted on 05:52 by hony
I don't know about anyone else, but I've gotten a little tired of hearing about what infernally terrible drivers we all are while on our cell phones. Now, it may be that scientists have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that we become less attentive drivers while talking on cell phones. They may have also proven that hands-free talking is no less dangerous, and that texting is also a driving impairment.

But come on, lighten up. I drive home from work, and my commute is about 13 miles (each way) of medium to heavy traffic, and over half of the people on the road with me are on their cell phones. And yet, I have witnessed one accident (motorcyclist fell over) on my specific commute route in several months.

I humbly submit that the entities advocating cell phone bans in cars are oversimplifying the situation to a point where the math breaks down and their findings do not correlate with fundamentals of statistics. I spent ten seconds and created this chart to illustrate the view being portrayed about cell phones: the second you start using your cell phone you become a dangerous driver.

But statistics tells us that almost every situation on earth does not follow simple step functions that are easy to plot. Most situations follow the legendary "bell curve." So I humbly submit my own theory of car safety:
Most drivers are safe. When they turn on their cell phones, a certain percentage become unsafe, but the majority remain safe.

Cell phone ban advocates will not tell you the total number of people on cell phones, instead they just tell you the number of accidents caused by people on cell phones. This is a misleading number. This is similar to the idea that tornadoes only strike trailer homes, and then pointing to the carnage at a trailer park after a tornado hits (while ignoring damage to nearby "built" homes). Nor do they suggest that there is a car accident every 3 seconds in this country that had nothing to do with cell phone use.


I am not trying to suggest that cell phones do not impair drivers. I am simply trying to suggest that although cell phones may lower driving ability, it is very possible, if not likely, that most drivers have enough driving skill that even at an impaired level, they are still safe on the road.


_
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Self Defense at its finest.
    Why I own a handgun. Props to the student who used "cognizant" in a sentence. _
  • Copenhagen Hypocrisy Watch, NASA edition
    I don't really want to jump on the "look, they are getting nothing accomplished" bandwagon because they are getting something ...
  • Swine Flu isn't even as deadly as the normal flu
    The CDC reports that in a normal year, approximately 36,000 Americans die from complications due to the flu. 200,000 Americans are hospital...
  • Pandering to my readers.
    As requested. _
  • "Leaving the Right"
    I wish I had time to write about Sullivan's manifesto he published yesterday. It was really pathetic. I just wish I could find someone ...
  • Hypocrisy Watch!
    Nothing says "conserve natural resources" like riding a toxic-gas-spewing rocket into space! The carbon footprint of a single lau...
  • Reinventing College
    TAE holds that the increasing cost of tuition is not increasing the quality of college education. Graduates are not smarter than they were,...
  • Here, I am. Send me.
    So I said: “Woe is me, for I am undone! Because I am a man of unclean lips, And I dwell in the midst of a people of unclea...
  • Haiti
    A youth minister in Haiti helping doctors writes to a friend of mine: I accompanied a small team of doctors to a hospital in Les Cayes that ...
  • TMQ has been reading TAE
    Gregg Easterbrook writes from ESPN : Soon, Barack Obama must make a decision on whether to continue funding NASA's daffy plan to build a...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2010 (147)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ▼  2009 (353)
    • ►  December (36)
    • ►  November (46)
    • ►  October (45)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ▼  August (44)
      • The Logic of Sobriety
      • Dreaming
      • Deep Thought On Weather
      • One Big Baby
      • Things you can't find on any major news outlet...
      • Because "Space Hotel" should redefine "posh"
      • Two-Party Systems
      • Gretchen, stop trying to make 'fetch' happen!
      • Don't read this if you like Ted Kennedy.
      • Cars and Cell Phones
      • Not a science post.
      • Science compels religion sometimes.
      • Deep Thought on bananas.
      • Deep Thought on Linguistics
      • Deep Thought On Healthcare
      • Rehab
      • IN DEFENSE OF BRETT FAVRE
      • How it all ends...
      • Bolt's Bolt
      • Life and love
      • Deep Thought
      • Death Star Located
      • Zombie Ants?!?!
      • The Polarizing Bear
      • Department of Sketchy Statistics
      • Emerging Technologies
      • inchoate pragmaticism
      • Whatev.
      • Why I keep making fun of Ezra Klein
      • Rebuttal
      • OH WAH WAH nominee 2
      • OH WAH WAH nominee
      • Be and Engineer, Get Rich
      • Large Hadron Collider to reopen
      • G.I. Joe Movie = Epic FAIL
      • TAE on Kamen on health care
      • Deep Thought of the Day 3
      • Deep Thought of the Day 2
      • Deep Thought of the Day
      • Friends With Benefits
      • Trust Your Elected Officials!
      • Superfast submarine prepares for testing
      • Engineering a Fat Nation
      • NASA visceration of the day
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (50)
    • ►  April (28)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

hony
View my complete profile