abujug blogspot

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Thursday, 3 December 2009

Reader Rebuttal

Posted on 05:44 by hony

TPI writes:
I mean, you're the libertarian here. People should be generally free to do stuff, so long as it isn't damaging to society, right?


I guess I'm libertarian? I hate the stigma of the title, though.

In TAE's perfect world, everything dangerous is legal, but everyone is smart enough to avoid dangerous stuff. Cocaine is perfectly legal and available on the open market (allowing tax revenue) but no one is dumb enough to inhale/inject/whatever it is you do with cocaine. Dynamite is also legal, but no one is angry enough to buy a truckload of it and blow up a building. Prostitution is legal, but no woman is at a point where she'll sell her body for money, and no man is at a point where he's so desperately horny that he'd pay for it. Gambling is legal everywhere, but people are prudent enough to not gamble with their money. Abortion is legal, but teenage girls don't get themselves pregnant, women are not raped, and birth control is used by any and all who wish to time their children effectively.
In my impossibly utopia, all is well and all are free. But we all make smart choices and we all take care of our bodies.

Back here in reality, we hardly make any smart choices. In fact most of our choices are terrible. Drug abuse is widespread, across all cultural lines, and abortion is a cauterizing hot button issue, both for people who fight for it and for those who argue against it. People still cover themselves in explosives and run into mosques, or murder their peers at military bases, or fight holy wars against each other. Prostitution and gambling are widespread and an unprecendented cultural phenomenon.

I'd love to say "sure, legalize pot...no one will abuse it" but the fact is that a lot more people would have access to it that are weak-willed than currently do while pot is an illegal substance.

Libertarians do not argue for the deregulation of everything, ever. Or if they do they are pointlessly idealistic. Instead, libertarians argue for the absolute safe minimum amount of government intrusion or regulation, especially into areas where no intrusion and regulation is necessary. In the case of motorcyclists wearing helmets and addictive drugs, absolutely the government should be involved, because enough people in our society do not have the personal fortitude to make the right decision regarding these dangerous things for it to be open and widespread.


_
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Self Defense at its finest.
    Why I own a handgun. Props to the student who used "cognizant" in a sentence. _
  • Copenhagen Hypocrisy Watch, NASA edition
    I don't really want to jump on the "look, they are getting nothing accomplished" bandwagon because they are getting something ...
  • Dick Cheney Justifies Torture With Results
    Dick Cheney: "Since the U.S. provides most leadership in the world, I don't think we have much to apologize for," said ...
  • Swine Flu isn't even as deadly as the normal flu
    The CDC reports that in a normal year, approximately 36,000 Americans die from complications due to the flu. 200,000 Americans are hospital...
  • Why I cry
    Life, as we humans know it, last about 70 years. But to some, you only get 7 months. I miss you, Krazo. (click on the picture for a full ve...
  • The reason trial lawyers love Democrats
    As reported here , Rep. Peter J Visclosky, D-Ind, has asked the Federal Elections Committee for permission to use campaign funds to pay for ...
  • IN DEFENSE OF BRETT FAVRE
    My father loves to hunt ducks. Every fall, he readies his truck, his duck-boat, his shotguns, his handloaded shells, his waders, his camo ge...
  • Saturday Poetry Burst
    i sing of Olaf glad and big whose warmest heart recoiled at war: a conscientious object-or his wellbelov'd colonel(trig westpointer most...
  • On Flat Tops
    I wish I could write that Nick and I spent 4 lazy days trout fishing and hiking in Flat Tops Wilderness Area. I wish I could say that I had ...
  • Pronunciation
    Yglesias : I don’t have a problem with the fact that Barack Obama says “Pah-kee-stahn” when referring to the country to the west of India. N...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2010 (147)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (18)
    • ►  April (37)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (31)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ▼  2009 (353)
    • ▼  December (36)
      • Live-Blogging Christmas
      • Good Science Ideas
      • isn't there some health care thing going on?_
      • Global warming is such a hilariously bad name for ...
      • Reader Lunacy, Changing the Subject Edition
      • NASA criticism of the day
      • Reader Rebuttal
      • Physics
      • Deep Thought on 3D Printers
      • Copenhagen Hypocrisy Watch, NASA edition
      • Reader Comments, CO2 edition
      • Monogamy vs. Biology, Ctd.
      • Wired to Cheat?
      • The Unsettling Carbon Conundrum
      • Quote for the Day
      • Bizarre Spiralling Light in the Sky
      • Deep Thought on Polar Bears
      • Deep Thought on Health Care
      • Weight Loss
      • Copenhagen Environmental Hypocrisy Watch!
      • TAE's Holiday Gift Guide
      • Reader Rebuttal
      • SHUT UP! post of the day
      • Pandering to my readers.
      • Capping emissions
      • Enough with the drug talk. Agree to disagree I gue...
      • The "War on Drugs"
      • More on Marijuana
      • Wikipedia Article of the Day
      • Reader Comments
      • Reader Rebuttal
      • "Leaving the Right"
      • Scientists grow meat in a laboratory
      • NASA criticism of the day
      • More football talky talk
      • TAE, prophet
    • ►  November (46)
    • ►  October (45)
    • ►  September (40)
    • ►  August (44)
    • ►  July (32)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (50)
    • ►  April (28)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

hony
View my complete profile